Hyderabad CHAPTER
The Risk of Being Seen Taking a Side
Hyderabad
August 21, 2026
In polarized and dysfunctional organizations, neutrality can be surprisingly risky. What appears to be composure, objectivity or a willingness to ask difficult questions can easily be interpreted as opposition. Yet maintaining a balanced perspective is a position of strength, offering the clarity to understand different perspectives and make decisions based on wisdom rather than allegiance.

In today’s polarized environments, taking a side can feel like the safest choice. It offers a sense of belonging and clarity. Yet in dysfunctional organizations, neutrality can be misconstrued as defiance.
Employees who remain composed, ask objective questions or avoid internal politics may find themselves viewed as critics. Toxic leadership can turn balanced behaviour into perceived opposition, making the neutral observer a convenient scapegoat. Sometimes, the wrong person becomes the problem simply because they are the safest person to punish.
But neutrality can also be a position of strength. Standing in the middle allows us to see competing perspectives, challenge assumptions and make decisions without being driven by pressure or allegiance.
Sometimes, the most effective approach is simple: play the ball, not the person.
Focus on the issue, hold your ground quietly and let the quality of your work speak for itself. Being in the middle does not mean standing for nothing. Sometimes, it means having the clarity and courage to see both sides before choosing a position.
Attendees
Srinivas Roas Mahankali
Ajay Jain
Maruthi Amardeep Sri
G S S Jagannath
Shiv M, Executive Director at Wells Fargo
Ashfaq Shaik, Managing Director at Deloitte USI
Vijaya Kadiyala
Sridhar Sampathirao
Aqueel Merchant
Sunil Venkatesh, Technology Consulting Partner at EY
Sekhar Guduru
Bala Prasad Peddigari
Ananth Srinivas
Naz Mir
Lt Col Pragathi Kumar Achanta
Sasikiran M
Gopinath Koneti